Posts Tagged Monash Council

Monash Council’s Governance Report

MONASH COUNCIL: GOVERNANCE IN CRISIS

 by Monash Ratepayers

Recently Monash Mayor Lake stirred up attention about conduct management issues during public meetings, of course blaming others and not himself. As the interest is about conduct, it is time that MRI evaluates the governance performance of Mayor Lake. This evaluation examines two areas:

  1. The hypocrisy, conflict of interest and governance issues in the Mayor’s per project – Alliance for Gambling Reform, which he discretionary gave away $25K to this MAV lead project with no accountability of outcome indicators and knowing that the project duplicates the State’s wee developed and active gambling program. Simply put he cost-shifted our money to a MAV project.
  2. The Mayor’s issues of hypocrisy, conflict of interest and lacking governance performance.

(1) Monash Gambling Program Management Performance:

City of Monash Public Health Approach to Gambling Policy Statement 2016 – 2020
has been produced under the banner “ Access & Equity Framework 2015-2020

EGM

  1. So how can Monash exclude certain groups from receiving funding if Council adheres to its own criteria of Access and Equity?

Refer to:- http://www.monash.vic.gov.au/About-Us/Council/Publications/Access-and-Equity

  1. Contradictions and Discrimination within City of Monash Public Health Approach to Gambling Policy Statement 2016-2020 refer to Agenda Item 2.2. Attachment 1. 31 May 2016 Council Meeting

 “1.12 Council will request that all venue operators make a financial contribution to services and agencies that address the impacts of gambling in the Monash community, for example Gambler’s Help, community health or neighbourhood houses services    (Page 17)

 

 “2.7 Council will maintain independence from the gambling industry. Council will not accept financial contributions from gambling venues and will not promote community grants or initiatives offered by local poker machine venues      (Page 18)

 

“4.3 Council staff will not run Council and community events, activities, programs and social outings in venues that have EGMs

“4.4 Through the Monash Community Grants Program, Council will not fund community groups who meet in venues that have EGMs

“4.5 Council will not provide community grants, funding, sponsorship, Council facilities, publicity or promotion for community groups/organisations that promote gambling. All relevant Council guidelines will align with this policy position

“4.6 Council will not support community groups participating in gambling activity and will seek to increase the awareness of community groups to the harms of gambling through information provision and referral to non-gambling community activities and services”

Unintended consequence? Many groups are involved in Community Raffles or conduct their own raffles, and these are deemed a form of gambling!

http://www.vcglr.vic.gov.au/home/gambling/new+applicants/community+and+charitable+gaming/raffle+frequently+asked+questions

  1. Passed (without due diligence) by Monash Council on Tuesday 31 May 2016, the 2016-2020 Gambling Policy Statement does not allow Monash Council to accept money derived from gambling activities. *It is noted that Cr Davies and Cr Zographos did not support the policy.
  2. Treasury and Finance distributes Community Support Fund money to Councils that has been received from revenue generated from Electronic Gaming Machines (EGMs) in hotels
  3. Therefore Monash Council can neither accept nor distribute Community Support Fund (CSF) money previously received from Treasury and Finance as Monash would be ignoring its own policy.
  4. Therefore the amounts of at least $118,000 [and $25,000?] marked as income from State Government Grants Community Programs in the Council Budget for 2015-16 cannot be received into Council’s coffers. Nor can any other monies from similar grants be received where the money has come via gambling.
  5. Therefore it is pointless for Council to threaten groups with not providing grants to groups meeting in venues with EGMs as Council will not be funding any groups via this revenue source anyway.
  6. In addition – there is a no proven correlation between the “problem (pokies) gambler” and community group membership, where group meets in a venue that has EGMs.

(2) LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE ISSUES

MAYOR LAKE’S HIDDEN AGENDA

The aim of the proposed exclusion (from funding) of Community Groups currently using rooms in Pokies Venues (most often offered to them free of charge) it seems is to bribe community groups into using Council Facilities at Community Rates; (see pages 98 onwards for rates per hour in Budget 2015-16)……and to ensure a pool of needy groups willing to utilise Cr Geoff Lake’s dream 6000 sq m Library-hub proposed for the Central Car Park Site.

Geelong Library

Not obvious to many is that the development of the proposed 5 storey Library Hub means selling this prime land of 7114 sq m in Glen Waverley and therefore removes the entire Central Car Park. It’s sale will allow adjacent high rise towers of 10, 15 (or higher) storeys between Coleman Parade  and Railway Parade North; between Kingsway and Springvale Road. (It should be noted that multiple community consultations confirmed that residents wanted this land left as open space and car parking,  underground. There was no business case for such a library – especially on this site)

High Rise

Lake’s preference to support endless construction in the Glen Waverley Activity Centre and to service developers whilst denying community’s wishes, is concerning. Especially as he has revealed he has accepted at least one  overseas trip (to Japan and China) funded by property developer/ financier Blackrock Real Estate Asia Fund II and Blackrock  Real Estate Europe Fund II (also a substantial  investment choice, at approx. $80 million, of Vision Super*).  (*see Link 2.  below)

  1. MAYOR GEOFF LAKE’S CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND HYPOCRISY

LINK 1. Cr Geoff Lake is a Director on the Board of Muncipal Association of Victoria [MAV] . He is on the MAV Board while he remains as a Councillor at Monash Council  

Via the 26 April 2016 Council Meeting Cr Geoff Lake proposed and coerced Monash Council to commit $25,000 to support his own self-serving “creation”, The Alliance for Gambling Reform , (AFGR) even though,  concurrent with the Alliance’s inception, on 30/6/2015 Council Meeting Item 7.3, Cr Lake is recorded as stating it would not have a financial impact on Monash Council if Council supported a Memorandum of Understanding with AFGR.

Not surprisingly, Cr Lake is the self-appointed Chair of the Alliance for Gambling Reform. The  website  www.pokiesplayyou.org.au clearly shows that its platform is specifically focused against gambling via electronic gaming machines at pokies venues despite this being only one of  many forms of legal gambling.

The Alliance’s  donations page https://gx.nationbuilder.com/donate confirms:

“The Alliance for Gambling Reform is proudly independent. We do not, and will not accept money from any organisation or individual with a financial interest in any part of the gambling industry.”

“We are 100% funded by donations from individuals and foundations that do not have any ties with the gambling industry We are not affiliated with any political party.”

No budget is apparent for why AFGR is entitled to this $25,000 and due to the criteria above, it is understood that Monash Ratepayers’ money (not CSF money) will be diverted to this organisation purely to secure Cr Lake’s relevance as a Director of the MAV. In short, Cr Lake siphons money  “out” of Monash Council  to the MAV (now in control of AFGR) in order to  replicate  services offered and delivered already via the State Government’s Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

*$25,000 is a considerable sum to hand over to an external organisation not based in Monash. In comparison,very small amounts are provided to worthy Monash Community Groups and only after time-consuming grant applications have been submitted. *It is considered this is an inappropriate donation especially in the light of Neighbourhood Watch for Monash residents has had its funding cut; Waverley War Widows will not be provided grant if they meet in RSL! Is this ignorance or irony –  when Sir John Monash, the Council’s namesake, was a revered returned serviceman?

Providing this money to AFGR contradicts Monash’s own guidelines:-

 “(Monash) Council does not fund projects that duplicate existing public or private programs”.

So how can Council substantiate funding The Alliance for Gambling Reform?

  1. MAYOR GEOFF LAKE’S CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND HYPOCRISY

LINK 2. Cr Lake is a Director of Vision Super Pty Ltd due to his nomination to that Board by the MAV. He is also the Chair of the Investment Committee of Vision Super . He is a Director of Pooled Super Pty Ltd. NOTE Vision Super is the default superannuation fund of Council Employees including Monash employees.

Source-https://www.linkedin.com/in/geofflake

 

Cr Lake boasts, as representative of Vision Super from June 2009 – Present (7 years), that  he is responsible for “developing new investment beliefs, drafting new investment policies”, and “as a director of the fund  I am jointly responsible as part of the board for shaping strategy, overseeing investments, governance, performance, compliance, risk management and stakeholder relationships.”

https://www.visionsuper.com.au/images/employer-reports/Annual-Report-2015.pdf<https://www.visionsuper.com.au/images/employer-reports/Annual-Report-2015.pdf>
https://www.visionsuper.com.au/investments/top-stock-holdings

As Chair of the Vision Super Investment Committee he supports Aristocrat Leisure Limited as one of their top 20 stockholdings. Aristocrat Leisure Limited is one of the world’s leading providers of gaming solutions and one of the largest manufacturers of poker machines in the world.. licensed in 240 gaming jurisdictions in 90 countries.

*DIRECT HYPOCRISY with regard to his role as Chair of Alliance for Gambling Reform – via Vision Super Cr Lake invests millions of dollars in shares in Aristocrat, the producer of EGM’s and yet campaigns against them? Go figure?

 

  1. MAYOR GEOFF LAKE’S CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND HYPOCRISY

LINK 3. , Cr Lake is member of the Administrative Committee of the Australian Labor Party [ALP]

ALP receives donations from Unions – for example, those involved in construction of all these towers! and from gambling revenue derived from (ALP owned) Labor Clubs. Pokies  owned and operated by the CFMEU or the ACT ALP through their licensed gambling clubs.The ALP State Conference 2016 will be held at the Moonee Valley Racecourse –oops Cr Lakea gambling venue!

 

  1. MAYOR GEOFF LAKE’S HYPOCRISY

From various other benefactors Cr Lake has accepted free entry to the Men’s Semi Final and Final Australian Open 2015, AFL Grand Final 2015, Cricket, Oaks Day Flemington , i.e  each Sportsbet / TAB giants. Is this elitist snobbery? Practice what you preach Geoff. Lead by example not by threats.

  1. MAYOR GEOFF LAKE’S HYPOCRISY and NON COMPLIANCE

Mayor Geoff Lake should adhere to Monash Council’s Access and Equity policy– his latest orders imposed on Councillors and Public on 31 May 2016, contravene basic human rights. Threatening members of the public voicing disapproval with Removal; being Charged with an Offence and Fines of 2 Penalty Units (i.e. $300) shows his frustration at not making it through to being a Barrister or Magistrate! These are conditions imposed by Magistrates for breaches of Court Orders.

His manic controlling behaviour, emulating dictatorship, was highlighted on 31 May 2016 as he continued to humiliate Councillors whilst treating them like his children as he forced them to sign his ridiculous onerous codes of conduct (whilst excluding himself from these actions). His despotic  “Hands on Head” requirement of Councillors, instead of allowing hand raising, was amplified by his refusal  to demonstrate the action when asked to do so by attending journalist ….because HE FOUND IT TOO DEMORALISING. Is it unreasonable to expect that he’ll be forcing Councillors to kiss his feet next?

Kim-Jong-Un

http://www.monash.vic.gov.au/About-Us/Council/Publications/Access-and-Equity

“Principle 1: Human Rights

Human rights are the universal rights of all people to be treated with respect, equality and dignity. The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities 2006 (The Charter) protects and promotes human rights by recognising that all people are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

Monash Council observes the rights incorporated in the Charter when making decisions, creating local laws, developing policies and strategies and providing services.”

MORE CONTROLLING BEHAVIOUR:

  • Espousing transparency yet REFUSAL to Video Council Meetings as these would incriminate himself.
  • INSTIGATION of AUDIO taping of Council Meetings for his (GL’S) ears only – not the other Councillors. Destruction of the tape prior to the next council meeting! The Point?

 Trust me says the spider to the fly

BACKGROUND – COUNCILLORS CODE OF CONDUCT PASSED SEPT 2013

  • Act honestly
  • Not mislead
  • Exercise reasonable care, and diligence
  • Accept scrutiny
  • Ensure resources are used prudently; solely in the public interest

Cr Geoff Lake failed on ALL counts.

CONCLUSION:

CR GEOFF LAKE ‘S MULTIPLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; NON COMPLIANCE AND HYPOCRISY CANNOT BE IGNORED. HE DOES NOT REPRESENT THE COMMUNITY. DEMONSTRABLE SELF-INTEREST DEEMS HIM UNFIT TO REMAIN AS  A REPRESENTATIVE OF MONASH.

Prepared by Lynnette Saloumi,  President Monash Ratepayers Chapter of Eastern Ratepayers Inc Lynnette.mri@gmail.com

Advertisements

, , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Ongoing Poor Euvena Car-parking decisions

GW Car Parking PlanEuneva Ave car park was built using subscription money provided by Glen Waverley traders when they purchase their business licences. Reality sucks because customers of these subscribing businesses don’t park there because it’s in the wrong place for them.  The lead decision makers, Cr Lake and Klisaris, just can’t accept this reality, for reasons we don’t know or they are really lousy part-time car-park planning consultants.

In June 2013, the local papers reported that Monash Council is looking to traders and council staff to fill hundreds of vacant spaces at the $17.3 million white elephant Euneva car park, while shoppers and commuters battle for parking spaces in Kingsway and Bogong Ave (Waverley Leader, 6 June 2013)

In Aug 2014, the Euvena car park was less than 30% capacity and the Council decided to increase two levels of 176 car-parks to increase parking to five hours, while the parking limit for the remaining 177 spaces continued to be 3 hours. Cr Lake advocate against renting out of car parking spaces while acknowledging feedback from a community satisfaction survey revealed a need for more flexible parking in Glen Waverley (Waverley Leader, 13 Aug 2014)

Even more curious is that the recent 15 storey tower for Village Walk was granted an exemption from the required number of visitor spaces because, in part at least, there was spare capacity in the “nearby Euneva Avenue multi-storey car park”. Hmm, wonder what is the covet decision criterion?

In Feb 2015, Julia Rabar from Waverley leader reported the decisions made by Council to increase car parking hours in 2014 continues to fail attracting patrons. Patronage has declined further. The news article claimed “Cr Klisaris has also rejected a suggestion from the Glen Waverley Traders Association to scrap parking restrictions for the time being, saying the council was legally required to ensure customers had access to short-term parking…. Cr Klisaris said he would not bring forward a review scheduled for September.”

The Mayor said “We’re continuing to monitor usage and looking for ways to improve it, such as installing new signage,” and indicated that “two illuminated signs with a blue “P” would be installed to advertise the car park, with the cost to ratepayers yet to be determined.”

Glen Waverley Traders Association president Christo Christophidis supported current parking restrictions should be scrapped in the short term even if it meant commuters parking there (Waverley Leader, 19 Feb 2015)

No wonder car parking is in such a disarray, as it is last two years Cr Lake and Klisaris are directing Council officer experts how car-parks should be utilised. Why is this the case. It all links to the intending sale of central car-park that is anticipated just before or after the 2016 council election.

Is political self interest at play again in this Laklisaris city of ours?

Look at the facts:

  1. Euvena Car Park picture from Waverley Leader, 6 June 2013

    On 23 January (during school holiday season), the car park was just 27.5% used

  2. In May 2014, it was 29% being used and in December 2013, capacity was 28%.

Why are Councillors refusing to maximise returns from assets utilisation?

Do they not know they are breaching best value principles in their 2013, 2014 and perhaps 2015 decision making over Glen Waverley car-parking affairs and therefore not making decisions in the best interest of the community?

Dont Quit Your Day Job YetOne hopes these key decision making Councillors don’t give up their other day jobs, they do make terrible being car-park planning consultants.

,

Leave a comment

Are ratepayers going to pay for 2 mayors in Monash?

Paying for 2 Mayors in Council

Mayor GLWe just checked the ex Mayor’s personal blogging website and twitter  and he still claims to be the Mayor when the position has been terminated. The question is “are ratepayers paying for two Mayors in Monash Council?” Maybe two heads are better than one?

Not only our Councillors don’t commit to good governance practice in matters of using official Council information on personal website + social media and now this ludicrous claim of having two Mayors in Monash ! Great Mickey Mouse performance Mayors of Monash!

GL Still Mayor 2.jpg

 Update 14 Jan 2015: he updated his twitter to say he is just an ordinary Councillor (poor thing), but not his private blog. Lake no longer Mayor

,

Leave a comment