The latest Victorian Auditor General Office (VAGO) Local Government audit report for 2011/12 is now available. The executive summary extract is as follows:
Financial results & Sustainability
The combined operating results for councils deteriorated from a surplus of $1.11 billion in 2010–11 to $1.03 billion in 2011–12. An increase of $672 million in revenue (9 per cent) was offset by an increase of $752 million (12 per cent) in expenses, mainly driven by an increase in employee benefits arising from a $367 million funding call on the local government defined benefit superannuation plan.
The combined operating results of RLCs have also deteriorated from a surplus of $2.16 million in 2010–11 to a deficit of $3.06 million in 2011–12. They continue to rely heavily on council contributions to fund their operations, which represented 80 per cent of revenue. Without this funding, RLCs cannot generate sufficient funds to meet their financial obligations.
Of 79 councils, 73 had a low financial sustainability risk, five had a medium risk, and one was high risk. All councils’ results were impacted by the early receipt of two quarterly instalments of grant funding from the Victorian Grants Commission and a funding call made on local government to address a shortfall in the defined benefit superannuation fund.
Overall, councils, RLCs and associated entities’ internal controls were adequate for producing reliable, accurate and timely financial reports. Nevertheless, a number of common areas for improvement were identified.
Councils, RLCs and associated entities require adequate internal controls for financial reporting purposes to assist with the efficiency and effectiveness of their operations and to comply with relevant laws and regulations. As part of our annual assessment of internal controls we focused on controls for budget development and management and outsourcing activities.
Budgets of all councils were aligned with the four-year term of the elected council and the council’s four-year strategic objectives. However, 92 per cent of councils did not acquit actual performance against the budget or the strategic objectives set and 47 per cent did not have longer-term budgets beyond 10 years.
Seventy-seven per cent of councils did not demonstrate links between their operational and capital budgets, and minimal consideration was given to asset depreciation or the ageing of existing assets in order to achieve an appropriate balance between maintaining older assets and investing in new assets.
1. That councils should further refine their financial reporting processes by strengthening the review and assurance procedures over the accuracy of data needed for financial report preparation.
2. That the Department of Planning and Community Development should continue its work in developing regulations that establish the minimum standards for the form and content of performance statements.
That councils should:
3. critically review their strategic and service objectives so that they are clearly expressed, aligned and measurable
4. critically review the performance information in their annual reports so that it is relevant, balanced, appropriate and clearly aligned with their objectives
5. develop budget management policies and procedures to encourage consistency of practice
6. prepare and align financial and strategic budgets beyond the elected council’s four-year term to inform delivery of longer-term outcomes, and consideration of timely asset replacement
7. periodically review and acquit actual performance against the council’s budget and strategic objectives to inform budget management decisions and avoidance of overruns
8. review the link and impact between their operational and capital works needs when preparing the budget so that sufficient provisions are made for maintenance and renewal of assets
9. obtain independent assessments of the assumptions underpinning budgets to improve the soundness of budgeting outcomes and practices
10. provide a reporting mechanism for councillors to regularly monitor actual council performance against set budget
11. develop and maintain outsourcing policies and procedures that:
- mandate the preparation of robust business cases and require rigorous assessments of procurement options including outsourcing or insourcing any service
- mandate assessment of the alignment of outsourced arrangement with Best Value Principles
- address reporting disclosure matters
10. develop formulated and tested contingencies for delivery of critical outsourced services in the event of provider failure.
11. identify and register risks inherent in outsourcing and develop mitigation strategies and monitor progress in managing those risks.